Why
do I want to stand for the Council - again? |
|
Local
activism runs in my background. I come from a strong Labour family and have
been politically active since the early 1970s. I have lived in Islington for over
25 years and been resident in this neighbourhood for the last 8 years. I am
currently chair of Governors at |
Put simply,
my vision for a better Islington is one driven by a single goal: social
justice and community cohesion - resulting in a less divided Borough. Even
within Caledonian ward, we live in a place that has growing social tension
caused by: o streets
and estates that are blighted by physical decay just hundreds of yards from
places with pristine environmental standards. o those
who are increasingly affluent living cheek by jowl with those left in
poverty; o rapid
growth in jobs – yet many are beyond the reach of residents causing
enduring economic inactivity and a growth in the working poor; o neighbourhoods
where poor health conditions mean that residents have considerably shorter
life expectancy than in adjoining streets o low
educational attainment that leads to continuing inter-generational poverty I want
us to play a new active role in local leadership to deliver good quality
services to everyone, but to concentrate on meeting the needs of our less
affluent population and needier neighbourhoods. Political management of the
Council is no longer just about the
efficient delivery of “Council services”. In the future it must
be about supplying leadership that shapes and determines priorities for all
public services in our neighbourhoods. That is the clear difference between
Labour and the Lib Dems. When
Labour effectively lost control of the Council in 1998, it did not surprise
me. The last few years of the Tories – and the first year of the Blair
Government – were a very tough time for Islington. Every single year, the
Council’s budget was stressed-out and most of my time as Chair of
Finance seemed to be a constant process of cutbacks in spending and services. The Lib
Dems could not have taken over at a more perfectly timed moment for them:
since then, the Council’s support from central government has grown by
a staggering amount. Revenue support is up by 40% and capital grants have
more than trebled as the Labour
Government money has poured into the Borough. It’s no surprise that
services have improved – the least popular have been privatised and
more popular ones have benefited from new investment. A Labour Government has
really delivered for this Borough – especially in healthcare and
education. Yet, the
Lib Dems have failed massively. It staggers me that Islington is still making
financial cuts. I am outraged by how much the Lib Dems deliberately bias in
favour of the affluent parts of the Borough. I am shocked at how anti-family
their policies are. I am furious that the Lib Dems simply fail to understand
the impact of crime and anti-social behaviour. I am incensed at how the Lib
Dems are letting commercial developers cash-in on the rising land values in
Islington – with utterly inadequate community benefits. And I despair
every time I hear the Lib Dems pat their own backs for things a Labour
Government has done for Islington – never mind how the local
Councillors have the gall to claim credit for things Rupert Perry got for
this neighbourhood! The
LibDems were convinced Bridget Fox would easily win the Parliamentary seat in
2005 and Labour inflicted a defeat on the Lib Dems that they took very badly.
Now their winning momentum is halted, the spotlight turns to their
performance in local government. After 6 years, they have become arrogant and
out-of-touch. Many of their policies have back-fired and their reserve of
goodwill is depleted. Locally, the 3 Ward Councillors have not
“clicked” with residents and they have acquired a reputation for
being pretty lazy. They lack the community leadership skills that animate voters
– especially tenants on the major estates. Over the
last couple of years I kept finding myself thinking “we can do better
than this”. That’s why I decided to seek election once again
– to really do something decisive about the quality of public services
in this Borough and to make sure they benefit the less prosperous majority
who
live here. I hope I
can therefore offer a combination of personal commitment, experience, good
political judgement and original thinking to the challenge of winning for this
neighbourhood in May 2006. I hope
that Labour’s message will prove to be visionary and convincing. I want
us to campaign on a platform that promotes equality, opportunity and tackles
discrimination and disadvantage. That is what we believe in and it’s what
voters expect from us. There’s
an instinctive pro-Labour electorate in this Ward but a sizeable part has
been disillusioned by Labour nationally and still has negative memories of
our years running the Council. We must win-over new supporters and persuade
doubters to stick with Labour. We must promise changes that strike a chord
with what Labour voters really want. In this Ward especially, that means an
emphasis on: Educational achievement –
I want us to concentrate resources on the primary schools that educate
children from less affluent streets and estates. Early years childcare –
we must extend the benefits of Surestart to ensure fuller coverage of all the
hard-pressed families in this Ward. Public safety –
I want local policing that reflects the community and is sensitive to local
needs, community and is sensitive to local needs, backed-up with a
Neighbourhood Warden service and sensible use of CCTV Youth services –
we need tougher application of powers to crack-down on anti-social behaviour,
but we must also invest substantially in diversionary services that give
young people more activity and re-engage them with learning, work and restore
the norms of orderly and respectful social behaviour Excessive development –
the Borough has to stop buckling under pressure from developers and resist
the drive towards unsustainable housing density; I want Islington to have
consistently applied planning policies Housing crisis –
amidst the property boom are thousands of families and single people seeking
to be affordably housed; a minimum 50% of all new
housing should be affordable or socially rented. Environmental challenges –
the Lib Dems have “top-sliced” £2m from the Neighbourhood
Renewal Fund to finance a glory-project, the “A1Borough” which
clean-ups Touchstone
issues Over the
coming months, voters will want to know exactly where we stand on critical
decisions facing the Council. Be assured that, on some of the bell-weather
issues, I stand for: Decent
homes – Government stimulated investment has poured into the
Borough’s public housing stock and management standards have improved.
But thousands of tenants are apprehensive about transfer of their homes to
housing associations and are resentful about being arm-twisted into changing
their landlord. I think we must listen to tenants and give
them a genuine choice between RSLs and continued tenancy with the Council Diversity
– we live in one of the most ethnically and culturally diverse
communities in the Borough. Local political leadership must make extra
efforts to promote integration and cohesion at a time of rising antagonism in
our neighbourhood. We have a special obligation towards our neighbours who
are of the Muslim faith to ensure they enjoy peace and security in their
daily lives. Outsourcing
– over the last ten years, huge swathes of public services have been
privatised and I believe the time is right to seriously review the
effectiveness of outsourcing. Most private contractors might be cheaper, but
do they really offer a public service ethos? Most residents appreciate public
services that are more responsive and individualised, but the
private
sector has no monopoly on “customer focus”. I think it’s
time to actively consider bringing some services back in-house. The
education authority – this is the largest single piece of outsourcing
and was forced upon the Borough after many years of weak management. Although
there is a risk that the Lib Dems will fast-forward the decision to
re-contract with CEA, I want us to seriously consider the case for returning
the education authority more directly to the Council and run a joint
education authority with New
secondary schools – as the population grows, we clearly need at least
one further secondary school. But I do not support the current plan for a
Church of England sponsored Academy and believe we should be looking more
widely at different ways of bringing educational investment into the Borough
– and having a pretty hard look at where any new school should be
located. Council
finances and local taxation – It is essential that we keep Council Tax
close to the Councillors’
remuneration – the public is rightly outraged at the Lib Dem gravy
train. It is essential we promise to peg remuneration to an average wage in Traffic
management and parking control – have massively alienated many people,
although we should neither over-estimate the strength of this sentiment, nor
assume that dissatisfaction over this issue will convert into support for
Labour. We must manage car parking sensibly, reduce through-traffic and
encourage Islington residents to use their vehicles less. Road space is a
finite public resource and vehicle pollution is a serious health hazard. But
Islington’s crazy parking regime is not the way to do it – indeed it has
become completely self-defeating as drivers now know they can challenge cases
in court confident that the Council is bogged-down with appeals. Transforming
the delivery of public services – We need a new type of
decentralisation in Islington – one in which we bring-together the
local management of all public services in neighbourhoods. The Borough
already has forums where senior public service managers discuss ways of
coordinating and integrating the main services – health, social care,
public safety, environmental and emergency services – but these do not
result in services being delivered more locally . We need to
“pool” funds from different public agencies and
bring-together all the special grants that come from central government into
the Borough. We need to exercise good local leadership at the neighbourhood
level to make all the major public agencies - from healthcare, police to
transport - all focus on improving services and responding to local
priorities. The Copenhagen Play and Youth Partnership and the Caledonian
Safer Neighbourhood Panel are already beginning to do this local
“joining up”. A short biog I was born in For most of my working life I have been employed in the
voluntary sector. In the 1990s, I was Director of the campaign group, the
Unemployment Unit and a charity called Youthaid. In 2001, I was a founding
director of the Centre for Economic & Social Inclusion. For the last
three years I have been an Associate Director with an economic development
consultancy firm. My specialist interests are in social policy, the labour
market and in economic and neighbourhood development. I have also served on a number of public bodies. In addition to
being an Islington Councillor (1990 to 1998) for 6 years I was chair of the
main board of Greater London Enterprise leading it through a period of
immense change. Between 1997 and 2002, I was a specialist advisor to a House
of Commons Select Committee, was on the Government’s New Deal Advisory
Panel and was a board member of the Central London Learning & Skills
Council along with national advisory positions for the LSC. |